Search for Events

Let's Connect!

  • Facebook: norcalwine
  • Linked In: FredSwan
  • Twitter: norcalwine

Subscribe to Blog via RSS

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Sponsors

Things You'll Enjoy


HdR_2011_PressAd2

Search for Wine Info

Able Grape, a wine information search engine

Our Twitter Feed

Follow me on twitter

Honors

symposium-logo-large

2010  Fellowship Recipient

Three Quick Things - Falsified Data, Alcohol Statements and Wine Education PDF Print E-mail
General Interest
Written by Fred Swan   
Friday, 13 January 2012 15:56

Thoughts on the Allegations of Falsified Data by a Medical Researcher of Red Wine and Resveratrol

I reported on this story in detail on Wednesday. At the time, my primary focus was on reporting the facts, not adding commentary. However, I find that two things — aside from the apparent fraud — continue to bother me.

UConn says the announcement is the result of the three-year investigation. Why are they just releasing information about the wrong-doing now? Was there not an earlier point when they could have acted? How much other research in that period has been based on Dr. Dipak Das’s work under the assumption that it was sound? How many funds have been plowed into further research by Das in those three years?

The second thing that irks me is that, even after the three-year investigation and warnings to 11 different peer-reviewed journals that published work by Das, UConn is not announcing which research was compromised. They say there were at least 145 instances of falsification or manufacturing of data. Which findings are now in question? Until we hear otherwise, we must assume that everything he's published is unreliable.

Illegible Labeling of Alcohol Content in Wine

800px-Magnifying_glass_with_focus_on_paperWine producers are required by United States law to disclose the alcohol percentage of a wine on each bottle. Wineries are required to submit labels for TTB approval prior to shipment. The TTB gives producers leeway of +/- 1% on the stated alcohol as compared to the actual wine. If alcohol content is between 7% and 14%, producers may omit the percentage statement and use the phrases “Table Wine” or “Light Wine” instead.

That’s all good. Except that, increasingly in my experience, wineries are making these alcohol statements so small and using ink so close in color to the paper that the statements are virtually illegible. I have good vision. It’s actually so-good-it-annoys-people-vision. Yet, even in good light, I find myself holding bottles right up to my face and squinting. In some cases, I still can’t be sure what the numbers say. For people with even slightly impaired vision, the text may as well say “up yours.”

Hey wineries who love microscopic type, you make an alcoholic product. You’re required by law to disclose alcohol content. How about following the intent of the law, not just the letter. Let us actually read the statement.

Openings for WSET Intermediate Classes

There are still a couple of seats left for WSET Intermediate classes which begin on January 19. The classes are administered by Adam Chase of Grape Experience. I’ve gone through his programs myself and highly recommend them. The classes take place at night in San Francisco’s Presidio. Contact Adam to register or for further details.

Follow NorCalWine on Twitter for breaking wine news, information on events and more. Become a fan and join the NorCal Wine community on FacebookAlso check out our comprehensive Northern California winery listings. They are very useful for planning a tasting trip or just getting in touch with a winery.

This article is original to NorCalWine.com. Copyright 2012 NorCal Wine. Photo by Niabot. All rights reserved.

 

2 Comments

Feed
  1. Fred,
    I think you need to check the regulations on variance of stated alcohol. - My understanding is that below 14.1 it is a +/- 1.5% over 14.1 it is 1% as you stated. The regulations for type size were created by TTB [nee BATF], to discourage producers from 'Advertising' the amount of alcohol in the wine/beer/spirit. Your statement about 'table wine' is correct but I would check the regs on 'Light Wine'.
  2. Thank you for additions, John.

    I simplified my reference to the variance slightly as that subject wasn't the primary point of my commentary. I apologize for any confusion.

    Your reminder on type size and TTB intent is a good one. The TTB does not want wineries, or makers of other adult beverages, hyping the intoxicating effect of their products. However, there is plenty of room within the regulations for legibility.

    Most labels sport alcohol declarations that are at least reasonably legible. Some are very clear. It's not just an issue of type size, but also weight and color contrast. My comments were addressed to those who approach, or achieve, illegibility.

    I'm also not implying that the wineries are intentionally trying to obscure the percentage for the sake of hiding high alcohol. In many cases it seems to be a design decision simply intended to make the label appear more attractive and less cluttered.

Add Comment