Search Articles

Please Share

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousStumbleuponGoogle BookmarksRedditTechnoratiLinkedin

Subscribe to Blog via RSS

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Search for Events


Most Read Articles

An "Interview" with Roger Ebert on Wine Criticism

You probably don’t know that Roger Ebert had thoughts on wine criticism. It may have surprised Mr. Ebert too. He didn't address wine writing directly. [He was actually a recovering alcoholic, dry since 1979, and wrote well on that topic.] However, much of what he’s said and written about film criticism is directly transferrable to wine reviews.

ebert620MontyBrintonI first thought of Ebert in the context of wine criticism more than a year ago during the Symposium for Professional Wine Writers. There were lengthy discussions on the nature of wine notes and the style of wine reviews, a pitched battle about how to address readers. How much reader knowledge do you assume? Are 100-point scores, or any scores, too simplistic? Are they artificially precise? Do you describe a wine or tell a story, detail the flavors or recount the drinking experience? Do capsule reviews have value? I realized that Roger Ebert had dealt, very successfully, with essentially the same issues for years.

How cool, I thought, would it be to do an email interview with him about this? That never happened. But, through his writings and interviews, I’ve been able to assemble a virtual interview pairing questions I would have asked with things he’s said relative to film. That interview makes up the latter portion of this article.

Roger Ebert vs. Robert Parker, Film vs. Wine

Wine-centric people might say Roger Ebert was the Robert Parker of movie criticism. It’s really the other way around though. Ebert preceded Parker in criticism, in gaining a national audience and in finding a way to make his work accessible to a broad base of consumers.

Both men have been champions for certain producers and genres. Both eventually supplemented their print work with alternative media, Ebert with much a greater enthusiasm and following. Roger Ebert wrote more than 40 books, his articles were widely syndicated, his television show, Sneak Previews—the most popular “entertainment” show ever on PBS—eventually went network. He embraced blogging and collected more than 800,000 followers on Twitter.

Like Parker, Ebert created a controversial, and extremely popular, new rating system that massively disrupted his industry. Ebert primarily used a four-star rating system that included half-stars. (In essence, it was an eight-point system. Zero-star ratings were reserved for films that were “beneath contempt.” Four stars were awarded to “first-rate” films.) However, he later created the even more accessible thumbs up/down system, popularized by his television shows with Gene Siskel. Thumbs resonated with consumers but enraged many of Ebert's colleagues who saw it (and the TV show) as the ultimate dumbing-down of criticism. Ebert argued, among other things, that it made film criticism much more accessible and created more film enthusiasts who would go on to want more analysis.  [See Richard Corliss and Ebert debate this subject through published articles, collected in Ebert's book, Awake in the Dark.]

Ebert knew that the “right length” for a review depends on the medium, publisher, audience, topic and audience intent. He wrote reviews of various lengths: multi-page, column and “minute reviews.” Full-length reviews allowed him to cover worthy films and their related subjects in detail and with meaningful digression. Columns suited some publishers’ needs while still providing readers with useful context. Minute reviews covered the same films and more in four or five sentences, briefly addressing plot, cast and quality. Many films got coverage of each type.

Film criticism and wine criticism have many things in common. Both have transitioned from a predominating style that was long and writerly, appealing to a small, passionate audience, to a period dominated by experts writing brief, easily digestible reviews and then to today’s world of ratings without context, aggregated scores, one-line exhortations and the notion that anyone with five senses and access to the internet is a valid a critic. The film and wine industries have grown more savvy in their media relations. Newspapers and magazines are much less willing to pay for good content and, after a decade or so of vastly expanded coverage, are reducing it drastically or going out of business entirely. Critics in both fields like to write about other critics and the state of criticism.

One might think wine and film are very different to consumers. I’m not so sure. Both have casual consumers who just want a tasty beverage or diverting flick. Both have enthusiasts longing for something challenging, a memorable experience, a spark for conversation with friends. Either way, people want to know whether the product is two hours of pleasure or a waste of time and money. And the price of either a bottle of wine or a movie for four people can easily range from $3.50 to $80, not including popcorn.

A Virtual Interview with Roger Ebert on Wine Criticism

[Change the words “movie” and “film” to “wine” as appropriate. Footnotes indicate sources.]

Fred Swan: Do you feel badly when writing negative reviews about wine?

Roger Ebert: You have to realize you're not writing for the filmmakers, you're writing for the potential film audience. And I would much rather hurt somebody's feelings who made the picture than send somebody to see a movie and spend two hours of their life seeing a move that I don’t think is worth seeing1.” [However,] what you must do is take them [the movies] seriously, and consider them worthy of your attention. You cannot be a useful critic if you dismiss them or condescend to them... If you believe a movie is good or bad or wins its audiences dishonorably, that can be a splendid beginning for a review, but you must remember that the people making it and seeing it have given up part of their lives in the hope that it would be worth those months or hours.2

FS: How do you approach wines from a region, or intentionally made in a style, to which you’re not partial?

RE: “You must be open to artistry and craftsmanship even in a movie you disagree with... It is meaningless to prefer one genre over another. Yes, I “like” film noir more than Westerns, but that has nothing to do with any given noir or Western.2

FS: What are your thoughts on wine writing heavy in jargon?

RE: "If you cannot write about it so that anyone who buys the paper has a reasonable chance of understanding it, you don’t understand it yourself.2"

FS: There seems to be an endless supply of “best lists” for wine. You’ve written a lot of lists yourself. Are these lists fair to the wines, do they really mean anything?

RE: “I avoid “best” lists whenever possible, this is a duty I fulfill. Because ranking films is silly and pointless, but gathering a list of good ones is useful.2

FS: As a critic, you’re committed to your opinions. How do you react when you get the inevitable negative comments from people who hated a wine they bought on your recommendation?”

RE: “When people write me saying they hated a movie I recommended, I am not inclined to write back telling them why they’re wrong—because they’re not wrong. You can never be wrong about your own opinion.3

FS: Critics, some in particular, are sometimes criticized for the style of wines they seem to appreciate and for giving high scores to wines that many people feel are of an inappropriate style.

RE: “As a critic, I am at the service of my personal reaction. If I laughed, I have to say so. I can’t suppress that information and lecture the filmmakers on their taste.3

FS: The internet—with blogs, user reviewer sites, message boards, Twitter and Facebook—has led to a proliferation of “critics.” How can the average wine lover tell the difference between an authoritative critic and someone merely offering well-written opinion?

RE: “The genuine critic will write in such a way as to acknowledge that he had a subjective personal experience that he wants to share with you, and which reminded him of other films or other subjects. He will wear his knowledge lightly and never presume to speak for other than himself.3

FS: You’ve talked about reviews reflecting your personal experience. Many people think wine reviews should be objective.

RE: “I have no interest in being objective or in reflecting the public’s opinion... The only critics of any use or worth are those who express their own opinions, which the readers are then free to use or ignore.3

FS: There’s often a popular backlash against critics, a complaint that reviewers have rarified tastes and don’t give good scores to mass appeal products. And then there are the “studies” that show consumers often prefer inexpensive wines to high-priced bottles in blind tastings. Should critics make recommendations based on consumer preference?

RE: “Any person who believes a critic must reflect the views of the public has not thought much about the purpose of criticism.3

FS: But you made an obvious appeal to those consumers, creating a rating system which is a vast simplification and leads people to make yes/no decisions without context.

RE: “There is a gulf between people who go to the movies (the public) and people whose lives revolve around them (critics, movie buffs, academics, people in the business). For most people with seven bucks in their pocket and an evening free there is only one question... that is relevant: Will I have a good time?... Writing daily film criticism is a balancing act between the bottom line and the higher reaches.4

FS: What are your thoughts on the the multi-tier system of wine distribution and the degree to which it limits consumer access to a broad assortment of wine?

RE: “The most depressing statistic I know about patterns in American film exhibition [] that an average subtitled film will take 85 percent of its box office gross out of theaters in only eight American cities and will never play in most of the others4.


Sources: (Page numbers not available due to Kindle format. Some of the quote appear in more than one of his books.)

1 "Fresh Air" broadcast of an onstage interview with Terry Gross and Gene Siskel, 1996

2 Roger Ebert, Ebert's Bests (Chicago Shorts), The Ebert Publishing Company, 2012

3 Roger Ebert, Questions for The Movie Answer Man, Andrews McMeel Publishing, 1997

4 Roger Ebert, Awake in the Dark, The University of Chicago Press, 2006


Follow NorCalWine on Twitter for breaking wine news, information on events and more. Become a fan and join the NorCal Wine community on Facebook. Also check out our comprehensive Northern California winery listings. They are very useful for planning a tasting trip or just getting in touch with a winery.

This article is original to Copyright 2013 NorCal Wine. Photo of Roger Ebert by Monty Brinton. All rights reserved.


#1 Rich 2013-04-11 14:13

Thanks for a clever article. There could be blogs just on wine criticism, meta-wine criticism, as it were. The problem with wine is that it is not just $11 and 2 hours of your time. It may be $500 and require ten years in the cellar. The number of wineries and wines is huge. The consumer is beholden to the wine critic.

#2 https://onomasato. 2014-05-07 13:57
Aside from the fact that diabetes is all about high level of sugar in
the body, another common thing is that this disease will last for a lifetime.

Crushed discarded cockle shells are an invaluable cheap bait addition
and crushed egg shell is ann added bonus in baits too and add calcium.
If you are like most people, you immediately think of an electrical plug
when you hear tjis term.
#3 2014-05-08 13:29
The xanthone antioxidants in the skin of the mangosteen fruit are knopwn to combat the organisms that cause rheukatism and
arthritis better than anyy other known botanical substance.
* Coconut oil contains antioxidants such as pregnenolone that are highly useful
for the body. PI: Gareth Lawson;Institut ion: Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution - Title: Horizontal and Vertical Distribution of Thecosome Pteropods in Relation to
Carbonate Chemistry in the Northwest Atlantic and Northeast Pacific - Summary: Pteropods are a
group of calcareous planktonic molluscs'.
green tea weight
#4 green tea weight 2014-05-08 13:31
It is best said that the health of humans, like all living organisms, is dependent on an ecosyztem
that sustains life. NSAIDs and other anti-inflammato ry medications
stop the conversion of arachadonic acid to prostaglandins at various
locations in the pathway. If you aree like most people, you immediately think of an electrical plug when you hear this term.
#5 Josie 2014-05-08 13:40
Apple Cider The apple company cider vinegar
Annd Cinnamon: A very efficient organic solution for preventing type twoo diabetes issues is to use therapy and nutmeg.
This is the first time modern researchers have witnessed the
event. Marine phytoplankton iss one of the strongest things
on Earth you ccan eat.
#6 2014-05-08 14:08
While the food industry has progressively altered the food supply with over-processing which takes out much of the essential nutritional value,
the wellness industry is seeking to improve it. Vitamin C is a popular antioxidant with a tremendous
volume of research behind it. His daughter claims that after eating
the pure algae, she lost weight quickly and effectively without even trying.
#7 Cornelius 2014-05-08 14:20
Aside from the fact that diabetes is all about high level of sugar in
the body, another common thing is that this disease will
last for a lifetime. Extensive scientific studies revealed that different arthropod activities influenced pollination:
. The nekton's role in the marine food chain
varies because they come in different sizes; a nekton could be as short
as few centimeters or be aas long as 30 meters.
green tea diet}
#8 green tea diet} 2014-05-08 14:24
These species included bees, wasps, ants, butterflies, moths, flies and beetles, just tto mention a few.
The first process, which has occurred for almost
40 years, is a decline per decade off an approximjate amount
of 4% of O3, and the second reefers to great amounts of O3 decdease durinjg springtime in the Earth´s poles.
His daughter claims that after eating the pure algae, she
lost weight quickly and effectively without even trying.
Green tea benefits
#9 Green tea benefits 2014-05-08 14:34
The xanthone antioxidants in the skin of the
mangosteen fruit are known to cobat the orgabisms that cause rheumatism annd
arthritis better than any other known botanical
substance. Oxygen Deficiency Effects When there is insufficient oxygen to support the health of a cell, the cell turns to another source of energy-- usually sugar fermentation.
PI: Gareth Lawson; Institution: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - Title:
Horizontal and Vertical Distribution of Thecosime Pteropods in Relation to Carbonate Chemistry
in the Northwest Atlantic and Northeast Pacific - Summary:Pteropo ds are a group
of alcareous planktonc molluscs'.
#10 Harriet 2014-05-08 15:30
It is best said that thhe health of humans, like all living organisms,
iis dependent on an ecosystem that sustans life. * Coconut
oil contains antioxidants such as pregnenolone that are highly useful for the body.
The order I use is dependent on the type of vegetable
I am juicing.
låna 2000 direkt
#11 låna 2000 direkt 2014-05-13 19:13
Also, there are those unsecured personal loans that earn much less as well as
short term. With the help of these finances you
can deal with all unsecured personal loans your crucial details and
wait for approval. Bad credit personal loans assure you that your loan will more likely to give
their money to businesses that are well-prepared for the
long haul. Today, unsecured personal loans it is possible for
them to find them. They are rather more interested in knowing and verifying unsecured personal loans usage of money.

Feel free to visit my homepage; låna 2000 direkt
Marine Phytoplankton
#12 Marine Phytoplankton 2014-05-13 20:18
Marine Phytoplankton is also known to be extremely beneficial to the eyes and greatly helpful
in improving the vision of the eyes by providing thee necessary vitamins to
the body. Crushed discarded cockle shells are
an invaluable cheap bait addition and crushed egg shell is an added bonus
in baits too and add calcium. The order I use iss dependent on the type of vegetable I am juicing.
irs concern?,
#13 irs concern?, 2014-05-14 01:44
Can I just say what a relief to find somebody that actually understands what thjey are disccussing on tthe
web. You actually realkze hoow to bring a problem to light and make it important.
Moree andd more people really need to look at this
and undewrstand this sise of the story. It's
surprising you are not more popular gigen that you surely havee
the gift.
morgans detox diet
#14 morgans detox diet 2014-05-14 12:11
Fine way of describing, and pleasant article to get facts concerning my presentation subject, which i am
going to deliver in university.
instagram hashtags
#15 instagram hashtags 2014-05-14 12:33
This post presents clear idea for the new users
of blogging, that truly how to do blogging.

Add comment

Security code