Subscribe to Blog via RSS
Search for Events
Recent Blog Articles
- 6 More California Rhone Wines to Try at Rhone Rangers
- Lodi Zinfandel Goes Native
- Study: Researchers Discover New Taste
- He Wasn't Talking To You, Mr. Outrage
- 16 North Coast Rhones to Try and a Toothsome #WineChat
- How Many Wines do Critics Taste per Day?
- Howell Mountain Spring Tasting Wrap Up
- Of Tasting Notes and Photographs
- Rhone Rangers Tastings and Rhone-Variety Wines Tasted
- How Critics Taste Wines - Glassware
- More Thoughts on Blind vs. Non-Blind Tasting
- A Great Tasting on Balance
- How Critics Taste Wines - On Blind Tasting
- On "Unexpected Napa Valley Wines"
- Robert Parker's Advice to Wine Writers
- Biodynamic Cabernet of Grace from Wise Acre Vineyards
- Back Labels I Can Get Behind
- Napa Valley Premiere - Competitive Juices Yield Record Prices
- Robert Parker Scores and Misses
- 18 Delicious Zinfandels You Need to Try at ZAP
Recent Wines of the Day
- 2010 Moone-Tsai Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley
- 2009 Hawk and Horse Cabernet Sauvignon
- 2010 Skinner Vineyards Estate Mourvedre, El Dorado
- 2012 Masut Estate Vineyard Pinot Noir, Mendocino County
- 2010 Gallica Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley
- 2011 Harney Lane Old Vine Zinfandel Lizzy James Vineyard Lodi
- 2006 Santana Supernatural Rosé by Mumm Napa
- 2011 Jekel Riesling Monterey and 2011 Jekel Pinot Noir Santa Barbara
- 2012 Matthiasson Chardonnay Linda Vista Vineyard Napa Valley
- Review from the Cellar - 2010 Qupé Mourvedre Ibarra-Young Vineyard
- 2012 Tres Sabores Rosé “Ingrid and Julia” Napa Valley
- 2011 Testarossa Pinot Noir Garys’ Vineyard Santa Lucia Highlands
- 2009 Lucia Pinot Noir Garys’ Vineyard Santa Lucia Highlands
- Review: 2009 Buccella Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley
- 2008 Vin Roc Cabernet Sauvignon Atlas Peak Napa Valley
- 2009 Cornerstone Cellars “The Cornerstone” Napa Valley
- 2009 Laetitia Pinot Noir Single Vineyard La Colline Arroyo Grande Valley
- 2010 Lange Twins Chardonnay Estate Grown Clarksburg AVA
- 2012 Borra Vineyards Artist Series Kerner Lodi AVA
- 2010 Wren Hop Pinot Noir “Fire Messenger” Sonoma Coast
NorCal Wine Blog
Biodynamic Cabernet of Grace from Wise Acre Vineyards
- Winery Profiles
- Written by Fred Swan
- Created on Thursday, 27 February 2014 08:36
A hundred chocolate-brown feathers litter the ground before the barn, the only remaining traces of a bobcat’s midnight chicken dinner. Seemingly unaware of their narrow escape, the remaining heritage Buckeye hens and a homely, bare-necked turchicken peck the earth between feathers for insects and bits of grain. Horses, rabbits and sheep are nearby and a friendly old, yellow labrador lies sleepily on his side, watching the action.
In the barn is a two-wheeled, hand-guided tractor that works the soil without causing compaction. A large plastic tub with a central filter occupies one corner, looking like an industrial version of a Bodum teapot. It’s used for making biodynamic teas though, nothing you’d want to drink. Just past the barn in the shade of a tree lies a large compost pile and, buried next to that, a decomposing wooden barrel filled with older compost and thousands of happy worms. Somewhere, cow horns are buried. They’re contents will ultimately be sprayed onto the soil to benefit microorganisms and increase uptake of nutrients by the plants.
The vineyard itself is small, just about half an acre, and slopes at 11 degrees down toward the barn. It’s set into a small bowl in the hillside which is consistently three to four degrees cooler than the valley floor but a couple of degrees warmer than the hillside outside of the bowl. Swirling winds prevent frost. It’s a nearly perfect site tucked away in a spot you’d never find on your own, even with a GPS. There’s not a single winery in sight. This is Napa Valley though, and home to one of that AVAs most lithe and balanced Cabernet Sauvignon.
Lynn and Kirk Grace of Wise Acre Vineyard. Photo provided by Lynn Grace.
Lynn and Kirk Grace bought the property in 2003. They planted it with 4 x 4 spacing to Bosche-clone Cabernet Sauvignon on 101–14 rootstock. That’s the same combination found at his family’s Grace Family Vineyards, considered the first of Napa’s “cult” Cabernet Sauvignon producers. Kirk is responsible for viticulture at Grace Family too, but his primary job is viticulturist for Stags Leap Wine Cellars. He held the same position at the certified-organic* Robert Sinskey Vineyards for nine years.
Lynn and Kirk do everything themselves by hand at their home vineyard, using bio-correct practices that Kirk has developed over 32 years of organic and biodynamic wine-growing. The wine is made solely from their Wise Acre Vineyard grapes by Gary Brookman. Brookman makes the wine for Grace Family too.
Despite their cult status, Grace Family wines have never been big or over-extracted. Raj Parr, well-known now not just for his wine expertise but also for his “pursuit of balance” and stance against high-alcohol wines has said, “Grace Family wines are among my favorite wines in the world… honest wines, true to variety and sense of place.” The Wise Acre vineyard is in a different location—in between the St. Helena and Howell Mountain AVAs—but shares the same vineyard set-up, practices and philosophy. Lynn and Kirk shoot for alcohol levels of 13.5% or less.
Their first vintage was 2008. I recently tasted a barrel sample of the 2012. It will be bottled in May and then age for another 16 months before release. I’d happily drink it now. In fact, I swallowed every drop of my tasting pour.
The wine smells of currant, red cherry, earth, spice and a hint of juniper. In the mouth there is a moderate amount of fine-grained, lightly grippy tannins balanced neatly with acidity. The wine will be lovely with food but, even now, doesn’t require any. Body is medium to medium+. Flavor intensity is excellent and the finish long. Flavors echo the nose with currant, red cherry, earth and spice but also a splash of mocha. I don’t rate barrel samples but, if this was a released wine today, it would be Very Highly Recommended.
Production volume is very low and heavily dependent on vintage. It’s been as low as 20 cases and will never be more than 100. Given that, plus the all of the hand labor, the pedigree and the quality of the wine itself, it’s a bargain in Napa Valley at $150. The wines are sold direct and there’s a 3-bottle minimum.
*Robert Sinskey has been Demeter-certified biodynamic. It recently cancelled their licensing/certification relationship with Demeter and can no longer use the term biodynamic but has not changed its farming practices.
Back Labels I Can Get Behind
- General Interest
- Written by Fred Swan
- Created on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 08:21
The vast majority of wine back labels are a waste of ink and your time. Their branding messages are weak and don’t help with buying decisions or inform your drinking experience. There’s not enough space to tell a compelling story about the winery or it’s owners. Descriptions of flavors are rarely meaningfully different from those on other bottles of the same variety nearby on the shelf.
Calera takes a very different approach with its single-vineyard wines and I love it. There’s no marketing blather or flavor descriptors. The text is focused, objective and its sole focus is to explain how the wine and the vineyard from which it came are distinct from other vineyards, including others at Calera.
This detailed, somewhat scientific, approach is not for every wine consumer. Many of the statistics are too technical for most wine drinkers. Casual sippers may not care at all. But then they are unlikely to be buying a Calera vineyard-designate anyway.
Back label from the Calera Ryan Vineyard Pinot Noir 2011
For avid wine lovers—and wine professionals—the labels rock, communicating vitals on the wine, vineyard and AVA clearly and concisely. This is particularly valuable for wineries, such as Calera, that market multiple vineyard-designate wines of the same variety. If there’s no clear difference between wines from the various vineyards, why make designates? But few labels communicate those differences effectively.
Another winery with really good back labels is Ridge. They take a more prose-heavy approach but still communicate very clearly on key topics: vineyard location and soils, weather throughout the vintage, yield and production volume, winemaking processes and their effect on the wine’s character, and estimated age-ability of the wine. [Alcohol percentage and percentages of each grape variety are prominently noted on the front label.]
When relevant, Ridge also compares the wine with others in their lineup. For example, the back label for Ridge Estate Cabernet Sauvignon contrasts it with Monte Bello Cabernet Sauvignon. All of the text is well-written and descriptive but not flowery. I hope other wineries move in this direction.
Napa Valley Premiere - Competitive Juices Yield Record Prices
- General Interest
- Written by Fred Swan
- Created on Monday, 24 February 2014 08:22
On Saturday, February 22, 225 one-of-a-kind lots of meticulously produced Napa Valley wine were offered at auction to some of the world’s most passionate and well-moneyed wine sellers and restauranteurs. Four-and-a-half hours later the last gavel fell and a record $5.9 million had been realized, nearly doubling last year’s take which had been an all-time record itself.
The gavel falls on the last lot at the 2014 Premiere Napa Valley Auction.
Photo Bob McClenahan.
The proceeds of Napa Valley Premiere go to support the efforts of the Napa Valley Vintners in promoting, preserving and improving that AVA, but there’s much more on the line. There is pride. There’s reputation. And, to some extent, there’s the promise of winery revenue. Stratospheric auction results aren’t an abstract number. They are to some degree a measure of the winery’s reputation, the star-power of the winemaker. Top results mean a press release and the opportunity to edge the price of all wines upward.
One particularly competitive winemaker stumbled toward me, crestfallen. “I’m a loser!” he said. This from a guy who was actually among the top sellers. But a handful of lots had gone for more than his best. Moments later when the 60-bottle lot of Scarecrow made by Celia Welch sold for a mind-blowing $260,000, he looked like he wanted to throw up. He was now “loser” by an order of magnitude.
For the most part though, Napa Valley Premiere was an “all smiles” event. Dozens of winery-hosted events earlier in the week had drawn trade buyers, top sommeliers and press to the valley. New releases, library wines and the auction cuvees were poured side-by-side. There were big dinners, quiet meetings, cocktail parties, dancing and more.
The after-lunch auction itself was preceded by a tasting of all the lots that morning in the historic barrel room of the Culinary Institute of America at Greystone. It’s the best meet-and-greet-and-taste that this country’s most important wine region offers with samples poured by the winemakers, proprietors or both for a crowd small enough to enable friendly conversation and detailed questions.
I didn’t taste every wine this time, opting instead for deeper conversations and very detailed notes on a select number of wines which I was reviewing for the St. Helena Star. Alder Yarrow did make it to nearly every barrel though, so keep an eye on Vinography for his commentary.
Of the wines I did taste, I found much to love. There was the savory complexity of the Mt. Brave and the dynamically fruited Ovid. Oakville Ranch offered yet another supple, stunningly gorgeous Cabernet Franc. Inglenook’s wine is showing heightened sophistication under estate manager Philippe Bascaules. New label Pulido-Walker debuted with a wine made by Thomas Brown that offered amazingly pure aromas of freshly crushed black currants. Another wine by Brown, for THE GRADE, offered mineral-laden scents and a beautifully creamy mouthfeel. Schramsberg refreshed and delighted with a late-disgorged sparkling wine from the 1993 vintage. I taste thousands of wines every year. Many of them are truly excellent. Nonetheless my pen was shocked to be writing scores such as 95, 96 and 97 with such frequency.
Quick Stats for the 2014 Premiere Napa Valley Auction
Auction lots - 225
Total revenue - $5.9 million
Average bottle price - $283
Highest-selling debut offering - Pulido-Walker for $65,000
Top Ten Lots
$260,000 from The Wine House for 60 bottles of Scarecrow made by Celia Welch
$100,000 from Beverage Warehouse for 60 bottles of ZD Wines made by Brandon deLeuze and Chris Pisani
$100,000 from Zoes Restaurant for 60 bottles of Shafer made by Elias Fernandez
$100,000 from Bounty Hunter for 60 bottles of Schrader made by Thomas Brown
$90,000 from Wine Library for 240 bottles of Robert Mondavi Winery made by Genevieve Janssens
$90,000 from Wine Library for 240 bottles of Cakebread Cellars made by Julianne Laks
$85,000 from Wine Library for 120 bottles of Bevan Cellars & Chateau Boswell made by Russell Bevan
$80,000 from Cliffewood Wine Syndicate for 240 bottles of Reynolds Family, Constant and David Arthur made by Steve Reynolds
$80,000 from Imbibe Wine & Spirits for 60 bottles of VHR Vine Hill Ranch made by Francoise Peschon
$80,000 from Total Wine for 240 bottles of Silver Oak made by Daniel Baron
Top Five Bottle Prices
$4,333 for Scarecrow
$1,666 for ZD Wines
$1,666 for Shafer
$1,666 for Schrader
$1,333 for VHR Vine Hill Ranch
Most Represented Winemakers
Thomas Brown - eight wineries
Philippe Melka - seven wineries
Aaron Pott - four wineries
Top Grossing Winemakers
$340,000 - Celia Welch
$302,000 - Philippe Melka
$255,000 - Thomas Brown
$113.000 - Russell Bevan
Total Wine & More of Potomac, MD
Bounty Hunter of Napa, CA
Cliffewood Wine Syndicate of Little Rock, AR
Wine Library of Springfield, NJ
The Wine House of Los Angeles, CA
Gary’s Wine & Marketplace of Madison, NJ
Nakagawa Wine Company of Tokyo, Japan
Beverage Warehouse of Los Angeles, CA
Yakiniku Hiroshi of Honolulu, HI
Meritage Wine Market of Encinitas, CA
Zoes Restaurant of Virginia Beach, VA
HEB of San Antonio, TX.
Specifics on each wine can be found at http://premierenapawines.com/2014/
Robert Parker Scores and Misses
- General Interest
- Written by Fred Swan
- Created on Monday, 24 February 2014 06:39
“I want to see all of you succeed,” Robert M. Parker Jr. told more than 40 wine writers in attendance at last week’s Symposium for Professional Wine Writers at Meadowood in St. Helena. This was a generous, perhaps surprising, statement from Parker who has frequently— and very recently—traded criticism and low blows with many of the same scribes. I’m convinced he meant every word, the denunciations and the well-wishes.
Robert Parker is full of contradictions, as are we all. But unlike the things you and I say, his every sentence is scrutinized, canonized and simultaneously chastised. He has long been the emperor of wine criticism. He remains so, though the power of that empire declines due to democratization of wine commentary and a recent secession.
As sound bites from Parker’s semi-extemporaneous talk were tweeted and retweeted, Facebooked and “liked,” outside observers responded instantly. “Words to live by!” said one. Parker’s statements resonated with many. But others called him “delusional” and “disingenous.” It’s lonely at the top.
Speaking of which, there were poignant moments. “I was extremely lucky,” said Parker, “I wish you all the success I’ve had. And the climb to the top is what makes it all worthwhile. Once you get there, there’s nothing there.” He’s been “there” for 30 years.
Robert Parker set out to be a consumer advocate. Ralph Nader was his inspiration. The clear conflicts of interest inherent with top British wine writers’ also selling wine were his call to action. He set out to create a newsletter with unassailably independent reviews. Parker’s identification of 1982 as a Bordeaux vintage for the ages, in stark disagreement with many critics, brought international prominence that he built upon for the three decades to follow.
Along the way he made and buried wineries. He can’t see that. Producers’ desire to rate highly in his newsletter drove richness in wine, and eventually alcohol, to unprecedented levels. He won’t admit that. He simply said, “I do believe flavor intensity is critical. And I am looking for wines that will develop in five to ten years. Some of the thin, feminine, elegant wines being praised today will fall apart. You need some richness and intensity for development.” Then there were popping sounds as some writers’ heads exploded.
Parker spoke for roughly half-an-hour and took questions for another 30 minutes. Listening was a privilege and a frustration. I was grateful for the opportunity, regretful he didn’t stay longer. Dozens of questions went unasked, as many conflicts unresolved. But Robert Parker did offer valuable insights. Later this week I’ll share them, along with comments from some other writers in attendance.
In the meantime, please enjoy this beautiful video montage of the symposium created by Kaethy and Tim Kennedy of Story Cellars.
Follow NorCalWine on Twitter for wine news, information on events and more, or friend me on Facebook. This article is original to NorCalWine.com. Copyright 2014. Photo of Robert Parker from erobertparker.com. All rights reserved.
18 Delicious Zinfandels You Need to Try at ZAP
- Tasting Event
- Written by Fred Swan
- Created on Friday, 24 January 2014 19:18
The 2014 ZAP Zinfandel Experience this year has a new format and a new location. The majority of events will be held at the scenic Presidio. And, rather than offering one massive, open hall of producers, this year’s main event is divided into three “tasting tracks,” each in a dedicated building. There will be Sensory Tasting, Reserve & Barrel Tasting, and Terroir Tasting. Each session lasts two hours so, if you wish, you can buy tickets for each session or spend six hours at one, etc.
I like the idea of dividing things up into more manageable and organized sections. The Presidio is a lovely venue too. Parking there can be an issue though. Arrive early or use whatever public/event transit is available. I’d love to hear your thoughts on these changes and especially your reactions if you attend. I won’t be able to go to the main event so I’m relying on you for feedback.
Another change this year was moving the trade & media tasting to a separate day. It took place Wednesday at Rockwall Winery in Alameda. I think this was a good move overall as it made for a saner, more focused tasting. There weren’t as many producers available but there were still many more than anyone could get to within the three hours allotted. Letting media taste in advance also gives me the chance to mention some highlights for you to seek out on Saturday.
Here are my favorites from among the nearly 60 wines I tasted during the walk-around.
(In alphabetical order by producer)
2011 Beekeeper Zinfandel Madrone Vineyard, Rockpile - $65
Very focused with rich black fruit and spice. Fine, grippy tannins and a long finish. Highly Recommended
2012 Bedrock Wine Company Evangelho Heritage, Contra Costa - $35
Concentrated and pretty with dark cherries and spice. Highly Recommended
2012 Robert Biale Vineyards Zinfandel RW Moore Vineyard, Coombsville - $50
Fine, chalky tannins lend structure to this richly fruited wine with toasty wood and chocolate. Highly Recommended
2011 Dashe Cellars Zinfandel Florence Vineyard, Dry Creek Valley - $35
Intense but balanced and showing a captivating melange of spice on top of ripe, dark berries. Very Highly Recommended
2011 Fields Family Zinfandel Old Vine Sherman Family Vineyard, Lodi - $24
Full-bodied and richly flavored with dark fruit, chocolate and a hint of dry herb. Highly Recommended
2012 Gamba Vineyards Zinfandel Estate Old Vine, Russian River Valley - $45
Luscious berries, chocolate and spice. Concentrated and smooth. Highly Recommended
2010 Grgich Hills Estate Zinfandel, Napa Valley - $35
A delicious, complete wine with lovely texture and 3% Petite Sirah lending Chinese 5-spice aromatics. Highly Recommended
2010 Harney Lane Winery Zinfandel Old Vine Lizzy James Vineyard, Lodi - $35
The vines are a century old but don’t lack power. Fine tannins and a blend of spice, ripe dark fruit and chocolate. Highly Recommended
2011 Hendry Zinfandel Blocks 7 & 12, Napa Valley - $35
A study in texture with liquer-like fruit and “walk through the forest” aromatics. Highly Recommended
2011 Jeff Cohn Cellars Zinfandel Landy Sweetwater Springs, Russian River Valley - $38
A complex and romantic blend of spices plus rich, chocolatey fruit. Very Highly Recommended
2012 Jeff Cohn Cellars Impostor, California - $35
Chinese 5-spice, garrigue and assorted fruit with a cashmere mouthfeel. Highly Recommended
2010 McCay Cellars Zinfandel “Jupiter,” Lodi - $28
A creamy attack precedes fine, powdery tannins and harmonious flavors of black and red fruit, exotic spice and toasted hazelnut. Highly Recommended
2010 McCay Cellars Zinfandel “Equity,” Lodi - $32
Scrumptious, earthy fruit and sophisticated texture. Highly Recommended+
2010 McCay Cellars Zinfandel “Contention,” Lodi - $64
Gorgeous texture and a symphony of harmoniously integrated flavors. A Zinfandel to savor and think about over the course of an evening. Very Highly Recommended
2012 The Prisoner, Napa Valley - $40
A full-bodied and potent blend with earthy, dark red fruit, Chinese five-spice, licorice and more. Highly Recommended
2011 Ridge Zinfandel Lytton Springs, Dry Creek Valley - $38
The coolness of 2011 brings notes of dark flowers and pretty spice to the fore. Highly Recommended
2011 Tres Sabores Zinfandel Rutherford Estate, Napa Valley - $38
Lovely, elegant and even lower in alcohol than usual for Tres Sabores. Ripe, dark fruit, attractive spice and a chiffonnade of savory herb. Highly Recommended
2012 Turley Wine Cellars Zinfandel Kirschenmann Vineyard, Lodi - $32
Full-bodied and creamy with fine, powdery tannins and a rich, tightly integrated blend of fruit flavors. Highly Recommended
Follow NorCalWine on Twitter for wine news, information on events and more, or friend me on Facebook. This article is original to NorCalWine.com. Copyright 2014. The ZAP Zinfandel Experience banner is the property of ZAP. All rights reserved.